The 5th ODI between India and Australia in the Hero Honda Cup 2009 was a lesson for me in many sorts. For one, it again proved that class speaks for itself. I wouldn’t be surprised if Tendulkar were to appear for a charity match 20 years down the line and score a century there too! The best thing about the man is that he is humbleness personified, despite reaching the various zeniths of success. Mind you, many people achieve success in life, but to retain one’s name as the best for a span of 20 years, is not everyone’s cup of tea. There have been Michael Jacksons and Mike Tysons who have tasted extreme success at some point in time, but they never had in their personality what it takes to handle the fame. The disappointment of the loss was so genuine on Tendulkar’s face, only a man of his passion could feel it. ( I wonder how could Dhoni come to the post match presentation with a smiling face
)
Secondly, the re-iteration of the fact that there is no short-cut to success. Whatever I spoke of Tendulkar in the paragraph above applies to the whole Australian team. Over 2 decades they have dominated world cricket. They no longer have the big names or the talent that they once had such as Shane Warne and Gilchrist, but they have re-built their reputation based on pure hard work. Let’s not forget that this is actually a back-up Australian squad; they have more debutants than India. Their fitness levels, builds, stamina, flexibility etc are all fruits of their efforts. They bat hard, bowl hard and one need nothing to say about their fielding. You can make it out from the sweat of Shane Watson who spends almost 80 overs on the field either bowling, batting or fielding – yet doesn’t show even a second of lapse in concentration. Talent can take you to a level, it can take the horse to the pool, but then the drinking has to be done by the horse itself. As for example, Tendulkar’s talent almost took India to victory, but the end had to be written by India itself, and it scripted failure. And is this the first time? Take a look at this chart: http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/current/records/284237.html . It gives the highest scores for a losing cause and you can see how many times the little master’s name has appeared in the list.
Next, success is all about application and commitment at the moment, on the field. These are 2 qualities that are inseparable – they come together: you either have both or lack both. If you see the Indian team fielding, they lacked both, because they were not committed, they were less alert, misfielded, dropped catches – put simply – didn’t get the things right when they mattered. In the final overs, the bowlers just went through the motions – as if they were paid only to make sure they don’t bowl wides and no balls and they were not responsible for anything beyond that. Barring Tendulkar and Gambhir, all Indian batsmen remain routed in crease with no footwork whatsoever, any good length ball results in a dot ball instead of a single, thus piling up the pressure to get runs off risky boundaries. Australia on the other hand, were like hawks on the field. They bat with amazing technique anywhere in the world, and their bowlers get pace and bite off the wicket on even dead flat tracks. Even when the match seemed desperately beyond them, the men from down under were pouncing on the slightest of opportunities – bent bodies ready to dive, flat throws to the keeper, cutting off quick singles, bowlers firing dot balls at the right moments, keeper saving what would have been 4 byes – all to make sure the pressure re-mounted on the batsmen. Their commitment resulted in better application – one instance, when they realized it was not their day in hitting stumps directly, they preferred to loop the ball across to the bowler who calmly got Jadeja run out. On the other occasion – the fall of the last wicket, the fielder from long on took his time, only to deliver the perfect long throw to the keeper which beat Praveen Kumar by the minute fraction of a second and resulted in another run out. 2 different applications, yet executed to perfection at the maximum of pressure.
Lastly, about luck and destiny – factors which we believe are out of our control. One can keep arguing – what if India had not conceded 22 runs in the last 7 balls of Australian innings, what if Nehra had not given a boundary at long on which seemed like no more than a single, what if Raina had not tried a sixer to a rising ball when India was cruising to victory, what if Jadeja had shown better common sense than that exhibited on street cricket, what if Praveen Kumar had dived into the crease etc etc, the list can go on and on. But it was clear that lucky and destiny favor only those who work hard and show commitment and application. Dhoni said in the post match interview that even if India had restricted Australia to 320 or 330, the result would have been different. I am sorry Dhoni, but in the previous match the target was only 250 on a good batting track, the team messed it up and allowed Australia to get the momentum which they will never lose for the rest of the series. Another day, had luck favored, Australia would have missed few shots in the end, Raina’s shot would have found the middle, the throw that ran out Praveen Kumar would have been wide, Tendulkar himself would have remained unbeaten and ultimately with even the slightest luck India would have won!
But it was not to be. Let’s accept that fact Indian team didn’t deserve victory on Tendulkar’s heroics alone. Yesterday only 12 men deserved victory – the 11 Australians and the one Sachin Tendulkar. It’s only sad that the Indian legend ended up on the losing side
.